Evaluation
Criteria against each KRA
This is one of the
difficult tasks which functional manager and HR manager will face.
I would
suggest both functional and HR manager to spend quality time on this because it
is the measurement criteria which will decide performance level of an employee.
I have seen many
functional managers stating that some of their KRA can not be measured in
quantity. But I feel that there is nothing which cannot be evaluated in
quantified term, but it is true that some KRA need lot of efforts to measure.
Now the decision which we need to take is whether we want to spend that much of
time and energy to evaluate that KRA or we would like to keep it as qualitative
evaluation where there is no as such data behind the evaluation and performance
is given on manager judgement.
Please note followings
while preparing evaluation criteria:
- Evaluation criteria should not be very lenient or strict.
- In case of lenient evaluation criteria, employee will over score and in case of strict EVALUATION CRITERIA, employee will underscore.
- Employee evaluation should be strictly on EVALUATION CRITERIA defined. In case of any change in evaluation criteria it should be properly communicated to employee before implementation.
- Employee should get 100% as performance in a particular KRA, when he do exactly what is expected from him. E.g. If a person is suppose to do 40 calls in a month then he should get 100% if he do 40 calls.
- There should be provision (performance slabs) of scoring more than or less than 100% also.
- There are some KRAs, where you don’t want to give more than 100%, in that let the highest be 100% and do not keep any slab for more than 100%.
Example:
Let’s take example of
above profile and try to define evaluation criteria for each KRA. Reader can
change it as per their own company design and process.
- Recruitment KRA
Below
is a sample, to define evaluation
criteria for Recruitment KRA. Let’s say, HR executive is expected to fill any
position within 30 days then following can be evaluation criteria:
RP Closed in :
|
Score
|
< 28 Days
|
130%
|
29-28 Days
|
120%
|
30 Days
|
100%
|
31-40 Days
|
70%
|
41-50 Days
|
50%
|
More than 50 Days
|
-50%
|
Hiring Open Till Date
|
-50%
|
Now you can see that
person has been given 100% for closing a position in 30 days wherein there are
options if person close the position before or after 30 days. You as a manager
can change the evaluation slab and performance percentage against each slab. Also,
you must have noticed that HR executive is getting maximum 130% and minimum
-50% for recruitment. Maximum performance percentage has been kept as 130%
considering that it is difficult of a person to achieve more than 130% in most
of the KRA (today even if employee can give 100% of what is expectation from
him then also management will be super happy J
). Minimum performance percentage has been kept as -50% to penalize employee
who are falling at “not expected level” of evaluation criteria matter.
I am taking so much
time to explain how to evaluate a KRA because if you understand how to make
evaluation criteria for one then you will be able to make it for other.
In above case, we are
assuming that one set of evaluation criteria will be sufficient to evaluate
recruitment KRA, but let’s say, you need two set of evaluation criteria to
evaluate single KRA. Example, if we say, HR executive should close below
manager profiles in 45 days but manager and above profiles in 30 days, then we
have two set of evaluation criteria to take care. Hence now it would look like
as below:
Recruitment
|
||||
Lead Executive and below
|
Managers and above
|
|||
RP Closed in :
|
Score
|
RP Closed in :
|
Score
|
|
<42 days
|
130%
|
< 28 Days
|
130%
|
|
44-42 Days
|
120%
|
29-28 Days
|
120%
|
|
45 Days
|
100%
|
30 Days
|
100%
|
|
46-55 Days
|
70%
|
31-40 Days
|
70%
|
|
56-65 Days
|
50%
|
41-50 Days
|
50%
|
|
More than 65 Days
|
-50%
|
More than 50 Days
|
-50%
|
|
Hiring Open Till Date
|
-50%
|
Hiring Open Till Date
|
-50%
|
Now you can take
average or weighted average of performance coming out of above mentioned two
evaluation criteria, to get Recruitment KRA final performance.
Join us on Facebook : http://www.facebook.com/pages/HR-SUCCESS-TALK/555022717854041
5 comments:
Service Management software helps you gain the IT process automation you need to drive and
support the business. Leveraging ITIL best practices, the intuitive, service-centric design
of FootPrints will help you to improve your IT services, streamline workload and effectively
communicate with your peers and the business, all while reducing the cost associated with
managing and delivering IT services.
Service management software
Service software
Mobile field service
QuickBooks service software
Field service software
service inventory
QuickBooks inventory software
work orders
service system
service management
Field force automation
Dear Sir,
Can you provide me the performance appraisal format which is generally used in IT companies(product & service based). If possible mail me so that if any changes required i can do that.My email id-saritapareek@rediffmail.com or saritapareek786@gmail.com
Expecting favourable reply.
Regards,
Sarita
Dear Sarita,
Request you to post your query on our HR SUCCESS TALK Forum. Link is provided below
www.hrsuccesstalk.com/forum
If we know the truth, then what do we do next? Is the software telling us the truth?projector service toronto
Very nice blog. Keep updating us with such blogs. Read about modern performance management here.
Post a Comment